| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
01/09/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
21/03/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
BUENO, M.; ROEL, A.; FARIA, L.; MASSEY, J.; PARFITT, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARCOS VALLE BUENO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. UFPEL-Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; UFPEL-Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.; USDA-Delta Water Management Research, Jonesboro, AR, USA.; EMBRAPA-Embrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Land-forming for irrigation (LFI) on a lowland soil protects rice yields while improving irrigation distribution uniformity. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Precision Agriculture, February 2023, Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 310 - 325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09946-8 |
|
ISSN : |
1385-2256 |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s11119-022-09946-8 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted 25 July 2022; Published 24 August 2022. -- Correspondence author: Bueno, M.; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Treinta y Tres, Uruguay; email:mbueno@inia.org.uy -- |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
During land leveling topsoil of relative higher elevation zones are removed (cut) and deposited in relative lower elevation zones (fill), this operation could have negative impacts on soil conservation and potentially can affect productivity. Although land leveling is an efficient way of increasing water use efficiency and irrigation uniformity, it can be rather expensive and, in some cases, a significant movement of earth may be required. Nowadays, with the technological advancement a new option is available called Land-forming for irrigation (LFI). This alternative method potentially allows smaller soil movement and consequently smaller cutting depths while improving irrigation and drainage conditions without affecting productivity. The hypothesis of this study was that applying LFI can allow a more efficient irrigation than the commonly used procedure done by farmers (Control: no alteration of natural topography) without affecting productivity. For achieving this, a 2-year 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 rice seasons comparison study was done in a semi-commercial field (12 ha) in Uruguay. This was the first time LFI was implemented in this country. For achieving the LFI alternative a soil movement of 104 m3 ha−1 was determined. The depth of cut was in average 0.03 m, with a maximum cut of 0.16 m. The total length and number of rice levees were reduced by 14% and 28%, respectively, compared to the situation this same field would be level using the traditional system (no alteration of original topography). Irrigation water moved across the LFI field more quickly and uniformly as compared to the Control. For both years of the study, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in fieldaverage grain yields between the LFI and Control treatments even though yield increases, and yield decreases were often associated with specific fill and cut zones, respectively. When data from both seasons are pooled together a significant relation was detected (% yield deviation = 0.81 + 140*cut depth, m). Taken together, this work demonstrates that, by limiting the amount of soil moved as part of the land forming process, LFI can provide the level of rice productivity as traditional leveling practices common to South America while improving irrigation distribution uniformity, setting the stage for improved furrow irrigation of rotational crops such as soybean. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. MenosAbstract:
During land leveling topsoil of relative higher elevation zones are removed (cut) and deposited in relative lower elevation zones (fill), this operation could have negative impacts on soil conservation and potentially can affect productivity. Although land leveling is an efficient way of increasing water use efficiency and irrigation uniformity, it can be rather expensive and, in some cases, a significant movement of earth may be required. Nowadays, with the technological advancement a new option is available called Land-forming for irrigation (LFI). This alternative method potentially allows smaller soil movement and consequently smaller cutting depths while improving irrigation and drainage conditions without affecting productivity. The hypothesis of this study was that applying LFI can allow a more efficient irrigation than the commonly used procedure done by farmers (Control: no alteration of natural topography) without affecting productivity. For achieving this, a 2-year 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 rice seasons comparison study was done in a semi-commercial field (12 ha) in Uruguay. This was the first time LFI was implemented in this country. For achieving the LFI alternative a soil movement of 104 m3 ha−1 was determined. The depth of cut was in average 0.03 m, with a maximum cut of 0.16 m. The total length and number of rice levees were reduced by 14% and 28%, respectively, compared to the situation this same field would be level using the traditional syste... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
IRRIGATION DISTRIBUTION UNIFORMITY; LAND-FORMING FOR IRRIGATION; LOWLAND SOIL; RICE; RICE YIELD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F06 Riego |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03571naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1063553
005 2023-03-21
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1385-2256
024 7 $a10.1007/s11119-022-09946-8$2DOI
100 1 $aBUENO, M.
245 $aLand-forming for irrigation (LFI) on a lowland soil protects rice yields while improving irrigation distribution uniformity.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
500 $aArticle history: Accepted 25 July 2022; Published 24 August 2022. -- Correspondence author: Bueno, M.; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Treinta y Tres, Uruguay; email:mbueno@inia.org.uy --
520 $aAbstract: During land leveling topsoil of relative higher elevation zones are removed (cut) and deposited in relative lower elevation zones (fill), this operation could have negative impacts on soil conservation and potentially can affect productivity. Although land leveling is an efficient way of increasing water use efficiency and irrigation uniformity, it can be rather expensive and, in some cases, a significant movement of earth may be required. Nowadays, with the technological advancement a new option is available called Land-forming for irrigation (LFI). This alternative method potentially allows smaller soil movement and consequently smaller cutting depths while improving irrigation and drainage conditions without affecting productivity. The hypothesis of this study was that applying LFI can allow a more efficient irrigation than the commonly used procedure done by farmers (Control: no alteration of natural topography) without affecting productivity. For achieving this, a 2-year 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 rice seasons comparison study was done in a semi-commercial field (12 ha) in Uruguay. This was the first time LFI was implemented in this country. For achieving the LFI alternative a soil movement of 104 m3 ha−1 was determined. The depth of cut was in average 0.03 m, with a maximum cut of 0.16 m. The total length and number of rice levees were reduced by 14% and 28%, respectively, compared to the situation this same field would be level using the traditional system (no alteration of original topography). Irrigation water moved across the LFI field more quickly and uniformly as compared to the Control. For both years of the study, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in fieldaverage grain yields between the LFI and Control treatments even though yield increases, and yield decreases were often associated with specific fill and cut zones, respectively. When data from both seasons are pooled together a significant relation was detected (% yield deviation = 0.81 + 140*cut depth, m). Taken together, this work demonstrates that, by limiting the amount of soil moved as part of the land forming process, LFI can provide the level of rice productivity as traditional leveling practices common to South America while improving irrigation distribution uniformity, setting the stage for improved furrow irrigation of rotational crops such as soybean. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
653 $aIRRIGATION DISTRIBUTION UNIFORMITY
653 $aLAND-FORMING FOR IRRIGATION
653 $aLOWLAND SOIL
653 $aRICE
653 $aRICE YIELD
700 1 $aROEL, A.
700 1 $aFARIA, L.
700 1 $aMASSEY, J.
700 1 $aPARFITT, J.
773 $tPrecision Agriculture, February 2023, Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 310 - 325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09946-8
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
16/10/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
15/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CUBBAGE, F.; KOESBANDANA, S.; MAC DONAGH, P.; RUBILAR, R.; BALMELLI, G.; MORALES OLMOS, V.; DE LA TORRE, R.; MURARA, M.; HOEFLICH, V.A.; KOTZE, H.; GONZALEZ, R.; CARRERO, O.; FREY, G.; ADAMS, T.; TURNER, J.; LORD, R.; HUANG, J.; MACINTYRE, C.; MCGINLEY, K.; ABT, R.; PHILLIPS, R. |
|
Afiliación : |
FREDERICK CUBBAGE, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; SADHARGA KOESBANDANA, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; PATRICIO MAC DONAGH, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Misiones, Argentina; RAFAEL RUBILAR, Universidad de Concepción, Concepcioón, Chile; GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; VIRGINIA MORALES OLMOS, Weyerhaeuser Company, Melo, Uruguay; RAFAEL DE LA TORRE, CellFor, USA; MAURO MURARA, Universidade do Contestado, Santa Catarina, Brasil; VITOR AFONSO HOEFLICH, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil; HEYNZ KOTZE, Komatiland Forests (Pty) Ltd, South Africa; RONALDS GONZALEZ, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; OMAR CARRERO, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; GREGORY FREY, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA; THOMAS ADAMS, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., New Zealand; JAMES TURNER, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., New Zealand; ROGER LORD, Mason, Bruce, & Girard, Oregon, USA; JIN HUANG, Abt Associates, USA; CHARLES MACINTYRE, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; KATHLEEN MCGINLEY, n International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, USA; ROBERT ABT, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; RICHARD PHILLIPS, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA. |
|
Título : |
Global timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2010 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Biomass and Bioenergy, 2010, v. 34, no. 12, p. 1667-1678 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.05.008 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 10 November 2009 / Received in revised form 31 March 2010 / Accepted 31 May 2010. / Available online 29 June 2010. |
|
Contenido : |
We estimated financial returns and wood production costs in 2008 for the primary timber plantation species. Excluding land costs, returns for exotic plantations in almost all of South America e Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Paraguay e were substantial. Eucalyptus species returns were generally greater than those for Pinus species in each country, with most having Internal Rates of Return (IRRs) of 20% per year or more, as did teak. Pinus species in South America were generally closer to 15%, except in Argentina, where they were 20%. IRRs were less, but still attractive for plantations of coniferous or deciduous species in China, South Africa, New Zealand, Indonesia, and the United States, ranging from 7% to 12%. Costs of wood production at the cost of capital of 8% per year were generally cheapest for countries with high rates of return and for pulpwood fiber production, which would favor vertically integrated firms in Latin America. But wood costs at stumpage market prices were much greater, making net wood costs for open market wood more similar among countries. In the Americas, Chile and Brazil had the most regulatory components of sustainable forest management, followed by Misiones, Argentina and Oregon in the U.S. |
|
Palabras claves : |
EUCALYPTUS; FINANCIAL MODELS; FOREST PLANTATIONS; INVESTMENT RETURNS; PINUS; RISK. |
|
Thesagro : |
FORESTACIÓN. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/3567/1/Balmelli-2010-Biomass.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02586naa a2200469 a 4500
001 1051156
005 2019-10-15
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.05.008$2DOI
100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F.
245 $aGlobal timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk.
260 $c2010
500 $aArticle history: Received 10 November 2009 / Received in revised form 31 March 2010 / Accepted 31 May 2010. / Available online 29 June 2010.
520 $aWe estimated financial returns and wood production costs in 2008 for the primary timber plantation species. Excluding land costs, returns for exotic plantations in almost all of South America e Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Paraguay e were substantial. Eucalyptus species returns were generally greater than those for Pinus species in each country, with most having Internal Rates of Return (IRRs) of 20% per year or more, as did teak. Pinus species in South America were generally closer to 15%, except in Argentina, where they were 20%. IRRs were less, but still attractive for plantations of coniferous or deciduous species in China, South Africa, New Zealand, Indonesia, and the United States, ranging from 7% to 12%. Costs of wood production at the cost of capital of 8% per year were generally cheapest for countries with high rates of return and for pulpwood fiber production, which would favor vertically integrated firms in Latin America. But wood costs at stumpage market prices were much greater, making net wood costs for open market wood more similar among countries. In the Americas, Chile and Brazil had the most regulatory components of sustainable forest management, followed by Misiones, Argentina and Oregon in the U.S.
650 $aFORESTACIÓN
653 $aEUCALYPTUS
653 $aFINANCIAL MODELS
653 $aFOREST PLANTATIONS
653 $aINVESTMENT RETURNS
653 $aPINUS
653 $aRISK
700 1 $aKOESBANDANA, S.
700 1 $aMAC DONAGH, P.
700 1 $aRUBILAR, R.
700 1 $aBALMELLI, G.
700 1 $aMORALES OLMOS, V.
700 1 $aDE LA TORRE, R.
700 1 $aMURARA, M.
700 1 $aHOEFLICH, V.A.
700 1 $aKOTZE, H.
700 1 $aGONZALEZ, R.
700 1 $aCARRERO, O.
700 1 $aFREY, G.
700 1 $aADAMS, T.
700 1 $aTURNER, J.
700 1 $aLORD, R.
700 1 $aHUANG, J.
700 1 $aMACINTYRE, C.
700 1 $aMCGINLEY, K.
700 1 $aABT, R.
700 1 $aPHILLIPS, R.
773 $tBiomass and Bioenergy, 2010$gv. 34, no. 12, p. 1667-1678
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
